27 June 2016
Reader Submission / Long reads

Promoting growth mindset and effort in mathematics classrooms

In the second of two reader submissions about the Motivated Minds partnership between La Salle Academy Lithgow and Charles Sturt University, Associate Professor Jane Mitchell, Associate Professor Sara Murray and Jeffrey Larsen share a feedback strategy to encourage students to make a consistent effort in mathematics class, and to help them see a connection between their effort and achievement.

Students with a fixed mindset believe that intelligence or ability is an unchangeable entity; while those with a growth mindset think of intelligence or ability as a malleable quality that can be incrementally developed through effort. Students with a fixed mindset think that intelligent people excel at schoolwork effortlessly. When schoolwork becomes difficult, students with a fixed mindset often struggle, or give up. In some cases, these students are reluctant to make an effort because they do not think they can improve their learning. In other cases, students can think that making an effort implies that they are not intelligent and that effort makes them look ‘dumb’ (Dweck, 2007).

In contrast, students with a growth mindset believe that with effort they can improve their learning and intelligence over time. When faced with a challenge, or indeed when failing a task, students with a growth mindset increase their effort in order to improve and complete the task successfully (Dweck, 2007).

Many students have a fixed mindset about mathematics. It is a subject that is often perceived as difficult – even the realm of geniuses. Mathematical knowledge is seen as unquestionable, thereby creating its status as ‘the ultimate intelligence test’. These powerful beliefs make it difficult for some students to define themselves as good at mathematics, and understandably students can come to believe that they ‘do not have what it takes’ (Murray, 2011). The feedback strategy at La Salle Academy – developed during the Motivated Minds partnership with Charles Sturt University – sought to counter this view with the message that through effort and practice students can improve their maths ability and achievement.

The value of student workbooks in mathematics

This action research project sought to determine the value of regular and systematic marking of student workbooks, as a means of improving student effort and achievement. Students’ workbooks are a record of their day-to-day practice of mathematics and they represent an important arena for the provision of feedback. We believe that the workbook is the central organiser and ‘engine room’ for considerable learning and practice of mathematics. Explanatory notes, worked examples, and student working and completion of set tasks, are all part of a workbook. In this respect the workbook is central to thinking and working mathematically.

In some mathematics classrooms, some students do not receive any feedback until they complete a test at the end of the unit of work. There is not always an opportunity for re-sitting the test or improving on their performance. The marks associated with the workbook were allocated as a portion of the students’ overall assessment marks and served as a useful complement to term and semester results for each student.

Major ideas underpinning the strategy

The strategy was based on a few important premises:

  1. Frequent systematic practice is important for student learning and achievement in mathematics.
  2. It is valuable for teachers to assess and acknowledge individual student effort in mathematics classrooms.
  3. Teachers can effectively assess whether students have the fundamentals of working mathematically in place by checking students’ workbooks.
  4. Assessing workbooks also provides teachers with a way of valuing the students’ effort associated with working mathematically.
  5. Allocating marks for this effort sends a message to students that effort is important in relation to achieving learning outcomes in mathematics.
  6. Over time, increased useful student effort will leading to improved learning outcomes, which will in turn shift students mindsets in a growth-oriented direction.

Strategy implementation

A workbook marking rubric was designed by the Mathematics staff which aimed to provide a time efficient method for assessing the day-to-day constructive effort of students in mathematics.

  • Year 7 and 9 student workbooks were collected on a regular basis and marked against this rubric.  The first and second marking times were used to evaluate the trial.
  • Teachers marked workbooks using the criteria outlined in the rubric (included at the foot of this article).
  • The workbook effort rubric was designed to be completed at the end of a four-week unit of work. The rubric was introduced at the start of a unit so that students were aware of the expectations for their workbooks, and of the criteria used to evaluate the workbook.
  • Teachers kept records of students’ marks over the time period of the project. Report comments and application marks were based on the outcomes of the students’ results.
  • Teachers held discussions with their class about the relationship between effort and outcome in mathematics; in particular about the worth of the students’ workbooks and the mathematical routines and practices they were encouraging students to adopt.

Evaluation of the strategy

The project was evaluated using three measures:

  1. Changes in student effort, as assessed by the workbook marking rubric.
  2. The correlation between workbook effort and assessment results.
  3. Staff perspectives on the project and students’ responses to the workbook rubric.


Initial data showed that a large number of students were making minimal effort with their bookwork and presenting incomplete and unmarked exercises, and disorganised working. Most of the students achieving excellent results were well organised with fully completed exercises in their workbooks.

During this project, the majority of Year 7 and 9 students (70 per cent and 85 per cent respectively), improved their workbook marks from the first to the second occasion. There was also a statistically significant correlation between students’ workbook marks and assessment marks. The correlation increased for the second trial (from 0.5 to 0.67 for Year 7, and from 0.77 to 0.79 for Year 9). Specific students were targeted for improvement in their workbooks. In nearly all cases, students who increased their organisation and volume of completed work showed improvement in their test marks. Students who did not increase their effort with their workbooks maintained their initial levels of performance.

The participating teachers were interviewed about their views of the project. They firmly believed in the importance of bookwork as a valuable record of a student’s effort. They reported that the workbooks are very useful both for students as a record of their learning and the product of their efforts: ‘I think bookwork is just essential, a crucial pathway tool. I think it’s the most powerful thing the kids have. It’s a reflection of them. It tells the student where they are and tells me where the kids are. But also it’s their pathway, it’s how you get to the next level – you have to refer to what you’ve done. If you don’t have that building block then you’re stuck at base camp.’

The teachers also used the workbooks to assess how their students were responding to lessons. They commented that the regular use of the rubric also made their feedback process time efficient and effective: ‘My biggest class is Year 9 and I wrote all of their reports in lightning speed and they were all detailed comments, and the only reason I was able to do that is because I had been looking through all their books.’

Adapting the workbook effort rubric

The workbook rubric shown below can be adapted and modified for a range of curriculum areas and year levels. The criteria can be varied according to the workbook and effort expectations associated with individual units of work. Likewise the descriptors for ways in which students meet each criterion, and the marks allocated to these descriptors, can be varied depending upon specific classroom contexts.

Workbook rubric


Dweck, C. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.

Murray, S. (2011). Declining participation in post-compulsory secondary school mathematics: students’ views of and solutions to the problem. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(3), 269-285.

If you’re considering carrying out school-based action research:

What will your question be?

Who will be involved (including external expertise)?

What data will you collect, when and how?

How will you share the results?

Jane Mitchell

Jane Mitchell works in the School of Teacher Education at Charles Sturt University in Bathurst. Her teaching and research are focussed on classroom pedagogy and professional learning. She has a long standing interest in partnership research with schools.

Sara Murray

Sara Murray lectures in child and adolescent psychology at Charles Sturt University. She has extensive clinical and research experience in young people’s wellbeing, mindset and motivation. Sara and Jane have worked in partnership with many schools to develop and evaluate teaching practices that increase student motivation and effort.

Jeffrey Larsen

Jeffrey Larsen is the Head Mathematics teacher at La Salle Academy, Lithgow, New South Wales. He has a Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and a Master’s degree in Education. With over 10 years’ experience teaching in both the United States and Australia, Jeffrey’s passion is inspiring young people to fulfil their mathematical potential.


  • What types of math work was completed in the workbooks?  Were the tasks computation based, inquiry, problem solving?  Could you give some examples?

    05 July 2016
  • The workbook effort criteria is basically a technical checklist. It seems to lack any quality criteria for the kids to adhere to. Regardless of whether the criteria is adhered there is no guarantee of quality work according to this rubric. See the NSW Quality Teaching Framework for an understanding of the difference between technical criteria and quality criteria.

    05 July 2016
  • This is excellent - well done. I love the way you have used journals to engage the pupils directly and provide valuable feedback in an appropriate way. I am conducting research as part of my PhD implementing growth mindset interventions in primary schools in Ireland and I also use a ‘mindset journal’ in a similar way to engage and inspire. It works really well and atps into the psychology of how we learn and interact with the curriculum. I’d love to learn more about your work if you can share anything. Again, great work! Inspiring stuff.

    07 July 2016

Leave a comment

School community